Correct Answer:- Option-A:-duty
Provided that where such authority is of opinion that the termination of the proceedings instituted against the officer had been delayed for reasons directly attributable to the officer, it may, after giving him an opportunity to make his representation and after considering the representation, if any, submitted by him, direct, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the officer shall subject to the provisions of sub-rule (7), be paid for the period of such delay, only such amount (not being the whole) of such pay and allowances as it may determine.
(3) In a case falling under sub-rule (2), the period of absence from duty including the period of suspension preceding dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement as the case may be, shall be treated as a period spent on duty for all purposes.
(4) In cases other than those covered by sub-rule (2) including cases where the order of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement from service is set aside by the appellate or reviewing authority solely on the ground of non-compliance with the requirements of clause (2) of Article 311 of the Constitution and no further enquiry is proposed to be held, the officer shall, subject to the provisions of sub-rules (6) and (7) be paid such amount (not being the whole) of the pay and allowances to which he would have been entitled, had he not been dismissed, removed or compulsorily retired or suspended prior to such dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement as the case may be, as the competent authority may determine, after giving notice to the officer of the quantum proposed and after considering the representation, if any, submitted by him in that connection within such period as may be specified in the notice:
🆀An officer remained out of service for a period of 5 years and one month consequent on orders of suspension and dismissal. He was acquitted to charges by the Appellate Authority and the period was ordered to be treated as Leave without allowances. Who is the authority to sanction LWA in this case?
A:-Competent Authority, since Government sanction is not required in this case
B:-Government, since the period exceeds 5 years
C:-5 years by Government and the rest by competent authority
D:-None of the above
Correct Answer:- Option-A:-Competent Authority, since Government sanction is not required in this case
Provided that except in the case of such officers as are governed by the provisions of the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 (Central Act 4 of 1936), any payment under this sub-rule shall be restricted to a period of three years immediately preceding reinstatement or retirement on superannuation, as the case may be.
(5) In a case falling under sub-rule (4), the period of absence from duty including the period of suspension preceding his dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be, shall not be treated as a period spent on duty, unless the competent authority specifically directs that it shall be so treated for any specified purpose:
Provided that if the officer so desires such authority may direct that the period of absence from duty including the period of suspension preceding his dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be, shall be converted into leave of any kind due and admissible to the officer.
Note 1.-The order of the competent authority under the preceding proviso shall be absolute and no higher sanction shall be necessary for the grant of -
(a) Leave without allowances in excess of three months in the case of a temporary officer; and
(b) Leave of any kind in excess of five years in the case of a permanent officer.
*Note 2.-The leave of any kind due and admissible referred to in the proviso shall include commuted leave also.
(6) The payment of allowances under sub-rule (2) or sub-rule (4) shall be subject to all other conditions under which such allowances are admissible.
(7) The amount (not being the whole) of such pay and allowances determined under the provision to sub-rule (2) or under sub-rule (4) shall not be less than the subsistence allowance and other allowances admissible under Rule 55.
(8) Any payment made under this rule to an officer on his reinstatement shall be subject to adjustment of the amount, if any, earned by him through an employment during the period between the date of removal, dismissal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be, and the date of reinstatement. Where the emoluments admissible under this rule are equal to or less than the amounts earned during the employment elsewhere, nothing shall be paid to the officer.
56A.(1) Where the dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement of an officer is set aside by a Court of Law and such officer is reinstated without holding any further inquiry the period of absence from duty shall be regularised and the officer shall be paid pay and allowances in accordance with the provisions of sub-rule (2) or sub-rule (3) subject to the directions, if any, of the court.
(2) Where the dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement of an officer is set aside by the court solely on the ground of non-compliance with the requirements of clause (2) of Article 311 of the Constitution, and where he is not exonerated on merits, the pay and allowances to be paid to the officer for the period intervening between the date of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement including the period of suspension preceding such dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be, and the date of reinstatement shall be determined by the competent authority and the said period shall be regularised, in accordance with the provisions contained in sub-rule (4), (5) and (7) of Rule 56.
(3) If the dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement of an officer is set aside by the court on the merits of the case, the period intervening between the date of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement including the period of suspension preceding such dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be, and the date of reinstatement shall be treated as duty for all purposes and he shall be paid the full pay and allowances for the period, in which he would have been entitled, had he not been dismissed, removed or compulsorily retired or suspended prior to such dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement, as the case may be.
(4) The payment of allowances under sub-rule (2) or sub-rule (3) shall be subject to all other conditions under which such allowances are admissible.
(5) Any payment made under this rule to an officer on his reinstatement shall be subject to adjustment of the amount, if any, earned by him through an employment during the period between the date of dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement and the date of reinstatement. Where the emoluments admissible under this rule are equal to or less than those earned during the employment elsewhere, nothing shall be paid to the officer.
56B.(1) When an officer who has been suspended is reinstated or would have been so reinstated but for his retirement on superannuation while under suspension, or has retired from service on superannuation before the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings against him the authority competent to order reinstatement shall consider and make a specific order.
(a) regarding the pay and allowances to be paid to the officer for the period of suspension ending with reinstatement or the date of his retirement on superannuation, as the case may be; and
(b) whether or not the said period shall be treated as a period spent on duty.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in Rule 55, where an officer under suspension dies before the disciplinary, or court proceedings instituted against him are concluded, the period between the date of suspension and the date of death shall be treated as duty for all purposes and his family shall be paid the full pay and allowances for that period to which he would have been entitled had he not been suspended, subject to adjustment in respect of subsistence allowance already paid.
If an officer under suspension dies before completion of disciplinary proceedings against him, the period of suspension can be treated as
A:-Eligible leave
B:-Duty for all purposes
C:-Leave without allowances
D:-None of the above
Correct Answer:- Option-Duty for all purposes
(3) Where the authority competent to order reinstatement is of the opinion that the suspension was wholly unjustified, the officer shall, subject to the provisions of sub-rule (8) be paid the full pay and allowances to which he would have been entitled, had he not been suspended:
Provided that where such authority is of the opinion that the termination of the proceedings instituted against the officer had been delayed owing to reasons directly attributable to the officer, it may after giving him an opportunity to make his representation and after considering the representation, if any, submitted by him, direct, for reasons to be recorded in writing, that the officer shall be paid for the period of such delay only such amount (not being the whole) of such pay and allowances as it may determine.
(4) In a case falling under sub-rule (3), the period of suspension shall be treated as a period spent on duty for all purposes.
(5) In cases other than those falling under sub-rules (2) and (3), the officer shall subject to the provisions of sub-rules (8) and (9) be paid such amount (not being the whole) of the pay and allowances to which he would have been entitled had he not been suspended, as the competent authority may determine, after giving notice to the officer of the quantum proposed and after considering the representation, if any, submitted by him in connection within such period as may be specified in the notice.
(6) Where suspension is revoked pending finalisation of the disciplinary or court proceedings, any order passed under sub-rule (1) before the conclusion of the proceedings against the officer shall be reviewed on its own motion after the conclusion of the proceedings by the authority mentioned in sub-rule (1) who shall make an order according to the provisions of sub-rule (3) or sub-rule ( 5), as the case may be.
(7) In a case falling under sub-rule (5), the period of suspension shall not be treated as a period spent on duty unless the competent authority specifically directs that it shall be so treated for any specified purpose:
Provided that if the officer so desires, such authority may order that the period of suspension shall be converted into leave of any kind due and admissible to the officer.
Note 1.-The order of the competent authority under the preceding proviso shall be absolute and no higher sanction shall be necessary for the grant of-
(a) leave without allowances in excess of three months in the case of a temporary officer, and
(b) leave of any kind in excess of five years in the case of a permanent officer.
Note 2.-*The leave of any kind due and admissible referred to in the proviso shall include commuted leave also.
(8) The payment of allowances under sub-rule (2), sub-rule (3) or sub-rule (5) shall be subject to all other conditions under which such allowances are admissible.
(9) **The amount (not being the whole) of such pay and allowances determined under the proviso to sub-rule (3) or under sub-rule (5) shall not be less than the subsistence allowance and other allowances admissible under Rule 55.
Note 1.-The amount of subsistence allowance already drawn should be adjusted against the pay and allowances or proportion of them granted under Rules 56, 56A or 56B or leave salary which may be granted to the officer.
Note 2.-The orders of revocation of suspension or of reinstatement after dismissal, removal or compulsory retirement from service take effect from the date of the order and the intervening period, i.e., the period from the date of order to the date of joining duty shall be regularised by granting joining time and/or leave due and admissible to the officer concerned. However, cases where there is an abnormal time-lag between the date of such order and the date on which the officer concerned reports for duty shall be decided by Government, on merits.
Note 3.-†When a period of suspension is ordered to be converted into leave, the amount of subsistence allowance and compensatory allowances already received in excess of the leave salary and allowances admissible on such conversion, shall be refunded. *However, no refund of subsistence allowance shall be necessary, where the suspension ordered on or after 24th August, 2007, is converted into leave without allowances for want of sufficient number of leave with allowances to the credit of the Officer concerned.
🆀On regularisation of the period of suspension as Leave, the subsistence allowance already paid in excess of the leave salary admissible
Which kind of leave can be granted to an officer under suspension?
ReplyDeleteA:-Half pay leave
B:-Commuted leave
C:-Earned leave
D:-None of the above
Correct Answer:- Option-D
2019 JULY EXCECUTIVE OFFICERS TEST
ReplyDeleteWhen an officer on suspension is fully exonerated, the period of suspension is treated as
DeleteA:-Duty
B:-Leave
C:-Suspension
D:-Reemployment
Correct Answer:- Option-A
Which of the following can be compulsorily recovered from subsistence allowance?
DeleteA:-Court attachments
B:-SLI premium
C:-Refund of advance from GPF
D:-Group insurance subscription
An officer remained out of service for a period of 5 years and one month consequent on orders of suspension and dismissal. He was
Deleteacquitted to charges by the Appellate Authority and the period was ordered to be treated as Leave without allowances. Who is the authority to sanction LWA in this case?
A:-Competent Authority, since Government sanction is not required in this case
B:-Government, since the period exceeds 5 years
C:-5 years by Government and the rest by competent authority
D:-None of the above
Subsistence allowance due to an officer under suspension is
DeleteA:-Earned leave salary
B:-50% of basic pay only
C:-Half pay leave salary
D:-None of the above
If an officer under suspension dies before completion of disciplinary proceedings against him, the period of suspension can be treated as
DeleteA:-Eligible leave
B:-Duty for all purposes
C:-Leave without allowances
D:-None of the above